Portland Trail Blazers 103, Oklahoma City Thunder 93: 2011-2012 Game 7 Full Recap; So Many Bricks, We Should Build a Shelter for the Homeless
Ach, what a painful one to watch. The Trail Blazers proved to be defensive stalwarts in the lane, great ball handlers, and the perfect anti-thesis to the Thunder. After such a strong start to the season, the last two losses have been disheartening. But it's important to remember that despite how hot this young Thunder team is, they still have some significant flaws to address.
The Trail Blazers are the perfect team to defeat the Thunder in all of the right positions. Marcus Camby is a wily defender in the lane, able to draw charges better than Nick Collison. He's aided by LaMarcus Aldridge, who can easily outwit Ibaka. He doesn't have the turn around jumper of Dirk Nowitzki, but he is able to shoot the lights out from mid-range. In the post, he's quick enough to avoid the help defense from the other side, and skilled enough to lay it in from tough angles. The Blazers were also excellent at utilizing him on the pick and roll, much like the Suns did for Amare Stoudemire.
At small forward, the Blazers have Gerald Wallace, who is the perfect guy to guard Durant. He's tall and quick, making him able to stay with Durant on the perimeter while also challenging his shot. His offensive night wasn't exactly impressive, but he only scored 6 less than Durant, which is a much better point differential than most teams have.
At Shooting Guard, Wes Matthews was the perfect compliment to James Harden. He can't run an offense as well as Harden can, but he's just as good, if not better, at driving the lane. With Camby luring our center out to the top of the arc and Aldridge always commanding a defender, it was easy for a guy like Matthews to find success down low. The same goes for Raymond Felton, who was also effective defensively because he can keep up with Westbrook's quickness.
Nate McMillan displayed some excellent strategy in tonight's game. His best move was putting in Craig Smith, who hadn't gotten much more than mop-up minutes in previous games. He knew that the Thunder would pound it inside if the Trail Blazers decided to run small. Craig Smith and Kurt Thomas aren't excellent players at first glance, but Thomas is an excellent glue guy, and both can provide size in the middle. They didn't spur any Portland runs, but they prevented a Thunder run from breaking out, especially in the second half.
Below: More Analysis, Awards!
Secondly, McMillan did an excellent job of taking care of the ball. The Thunder thrive in games where they can acquire turnovers and turn them into fast breaks. Tonight, the Blazers had only 9 turnovers, and severely limited the amount of fast breaks the Thunder had in the fourth (I only counted one).
The Thunder need to realize that their shooting can't carry them through all of their games. On a good night, a few more Cook and Durant threes would have gone in during the second half, and the outcome of this game might have been much different. But when we rely too much on our outside game, we're relying on something the Thunder aren't exactly too good at. I know the lane was becoming impossible to penetrate and Westbrook was drawing charges, but there's nothing wrong with venturing out to mid-range. Nearly every single player on our team can hit it from there well, and it's absurd to think that nobody was open.
How much did we miss Thabo Sefolosha tonight? Well, his perimeter defense was definitely missed. With Cook doing little but bricking threes, it would have been prudent to have Sefolosha out there. He has the size to force Matthews out of the paint, and can force a steal from someone who dribbles the ball too much. Offensively, his newfound mid-range ability would have been a sight for sore eyes out there tonight. I'm not ready to say that his presence would have changed the result, but I'd be remiss to say that it wouldn't have helped.
Blaming the refs for this loss is an absurd thing to do. Sure, you could point at the fact that we lost the free throw battle, but it was rightfully so. The Trail Blazers were making an effort to get to the line, especially when they were in an offensive desert. When the Thunder's offense started sputtering, they would settle for jumpers, hoping a tough three would re-ignite the offense. Unfortunately, the Thunder aren't the Warriors or Knicks. It's not their game, and playing like that is only going to exacerbate their problems.
To be fair, the Thunder are coming off of a extremely tough stretch. They've played 7 games in 10 days, including three back to backs. Two of them were against the defending NBA Champions, and 5 of the 7 games were against playoff teams from last year. Only the Lakers have played as many contests so far. I'm not blaming the loss on the exhaustion, but I'm sure it played a role.
The win brings the Thunder to 5-2, and leaves them tied with Portland for the first seed in the West. Portland wins the tiebreaker with the victory, and also leads the Northwest Division at 4-1. We next face the Trail Blazers on Monday, February 6th.
Thunder Wonder: James Harden, 23 Points, 6 Assists, 3 Steals
Thunder Down Under: Nick Collison, 6 Points, 9 Rebounds, 2 Assists, 1 Steal
Thunder Blunder: Kevin Durant, 8-26 Shooting, Only 4 Free Throws, 3 Turnovers
Thunder Plunderer: Lamarcus Aldridge, 30 Points, 8 Rebounds
Next Game: Versus the Houston Rockets, Friday, January 6th, 7 PM Central Standard Time
12 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Maybe this is that 8th game
From the preview…
Still, I’m predicting another significant victory for the Thunder. Until Greg Oden gets back, the Blazers will only win one out of every 7 or 8 games against the Thunder, when their offense happens to click on all cylinders. Otherwise, get ready to count this as yet another solid home win.
Of course there is always waffle …it is yummy
From the recap>>
The Trail Blazers are the perfect team to defeat the Thunder in all of the right positions
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
My reasoning....
But last year, the Trail Blazers lost a bit of the size they always had, and were forced to up their tempo. They were helped by acquisitions like Gerald Wallace, but they could never quite get the hang of playing the Thunder. Whenever they played small, they weren’t quick enough to force turnovers like most smaller teams do, and they certainly couldn’t run with the Thunder. Thus, they suffered from a lack of defense and rebounding in the post, while reaping none of small ball’s benefits. The games were always competitive, don’t get me wrong. But the Thunder would usually control the pace, and were winning relatively handily by the end of the season.
The Trail Blazers never played small.
Tony.psd = Da Man
Manager of Welcome to Loud City
#1 Warriors, Thunder, and Adonal Foyle Fan
The Blazers won on April 1st...by seven
But the Thunder would usually control the pace, and were winning relatively handily by the end of the season.
by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 4, 2012 10:34 PM CST up reply actions
Why OKC could not handle Portland
No inside presence on either offense or defense. Pretty simple
I agree
But the aspect that surprised me most was that Portland played at a much higher pace than they had last year. I imagine that’s in part due to having Felton at the point rather than Andre Miller. It really made them more dynamic though, and seemed to free up LMA for more uncontested shots.
www.welcometoloudcity.com
by J.A. Sherman on Jan 4, 2012 12:43 PM CST up reply actions
Defense
Hardin, Westbrook and KD played excellent defense. Westbrook hounded Felton. KD controlled Wallace. Hardin harassed everyone and seemed to have a hand reaching for every pass and dribble anywhere near him. Huge falloff after those three. OKC needs to make a deal for help under the basket. Perkins and Ibaka have trade value …. use it.
Durant played terrible D
I remember two possessions in a row where Gerald Wallace just backed him down for an easy lay-in at the rim with absolutely no resistance.
Westbrook gambles waaaaay too much. Felton burned him a couple of times when he went for a steal and got himself out of position to defend. He also got burned a couple of times going for offensive rebounds, only to have Felton go coast to coast.
In my opinion, Nick Collison is the best defender on the Thunder, by far. Every time I watch that guy play, I wish he was on the Blazers. He hustles, boards, blocks shots, and the guy is never out of position on defense. I think Collison is OKC’s best big.
I’m looking forward to the Blazers/Thunder rivalry this season.
not quite
Agree on Collison. Anyone who disputes that Collison is OKC’s best big is not watching.
KD? Nobody shuts Wallace out, especially on drives to the basket. KD made life difficult, which does not mean that Wallace never gets a layup.
Westbrook does gamble too much, but the answer is not to gamble not at all. Felton got to the hoop a few times, much to his credit. But, Westbrook made it tough for Portland to score off of Felton passes, which were always under pressure and almost always – sideways. Agreed on the offensive board work, but guards are forced to go to the offensive boards because Perkins is a joke as a rebounder.
Thunder will beat the Blazers only by doing what they do best -- making difficult shots and drives and playing pressure defense on the ball on the outside.
Thunder offense
Guys if your shot is not going down drive to the basket and get fouled Portland Is a very physical team and they dont mind fouling!!! Im talking to DURANT AND HARDEN!!! even WESTBROOK COULD HAVE DROVE MORE! COME ON GUYS THINK!!!
by doecolumbus on Jan 4, 2012 12:08 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
I think it is Scotts new haircut. I liked his old spiky/edgy cut
by Eufaulafan on Jan 4, 2012 12:15 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
this team cannot win a championship
With Scott Brooks, lover of small ball and no front court scorer. If only we had LA over stonehands Ibricka and I always get the ball stolen from me Perkins
by das06h on Jan 4, 2012 2:03 PM CST via iPhone app reply actions

































