Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: New York Giants Super Bowl XLVI Ring Unveiled

Quick 2010 Draft Review....What Happened?

Tibor Pleiss gets the death stare from his old coach. (Photo by Alex Grimm/Bongarts/Getty Images)

First of all, apologies for not being here on Draft Night. Being in South Africa rocks, but a downside is that you have to stay up late into the night to see NBA events. Regardless, here's a quick recap and take of what happened last night. Expect full profiles of the new players as we head forward.

Trade 1: The Oklahoma City Thunder Trade Pick #31 to the Miami Heat for Pick #18 and Daequan Cook.

Thunder Gain: A Higher Pick, A Potential Rotation Player

Heat Gain: Cap Room for the 2010 Free Agency Dash, a pick at a good value.

Analysis: It's a trade that works out for both sides, if it is a bit in the Thunder's favour. At this point, any team is going to have to pay a hefty price in order to get salary for next year's FA, and this is about as small of a price Miami was going to find. On the Thunder's side of things, it's basically little risk, big reward. They got more cards to play with concerning getting a higher pick, and they picked up Cook, who was a solid rotation player for some solid Heat teams. While being a bit of a defensive liability, he's the type of guy who can step off the bench and hit a few threes, which is exactly what fans have been pining for. Overall, the trade is an A for the Thunder, and a C+ for the Heat.

Community Takes:

 

BTW EP, you and I align completely on the Daniel Orton and Alabi thoughts. Please no…I’m not a big Sanders fan either, mainly because I think he’s too much like Serge. I do have a feeling that the 18th pick will end up being somebody who was supposed to go late lottery and dropped. Udoh perhaps? Yeah I could definitely see that if late-lottery/bad playoff teams went crazy on George, Hayward, Babbit, and Bradley.

The other pick is the seemingly inevitable Orton pick, which means 26 probably has to be a perimeter player of some sort…Crawford? I would KILL if we could get Ryan Richards at 52, or just buy him off whomever drafts him.

-GoHornsGo90

I'd like Sanders and James Anderson

I’ve seen mocks that have Anderson falling all the way to 30. SOme have him as high as 15. I’m not sure what the deal is with him rising and falling.

Ideally, I’d like to see us move up and get Monroe, but I’m not sure if it’ll happen.

-ElectricPencils

Below: More Trades! More Analysis! More Madness!

Star-divide

Trade 2: The Oklahoma City Thunder trade Pick #21 and Pick #26 to the New Orleans Hornets for Morris Peterson and Pick #11 (Cole Aldrich).

Thunder Gain: A better prospect, a potential rotation player.

Hornets Gain: About 6 Million in Cap Space, and 2 Shots in the Dark later in the draft.

Analysis: Everybody here was fearing the Aldrich trade. We all thought he was a bit overrated, and not someone to give up actual value for. And, somehow, it happened. But, it's not as bad as we thought it was. Instead of giving up Pick 18 and 21, as was originally thought, we ended up giving only 21 and 26. On paper, having the 18th pick versus having the 26th pick may not seem like a lot, but nobody wants the 26th pick. It's right at the end of the first round, and as such, it's one of the last picks where players will demand a certain amount of salary. Also, around the early to mid twenties, players stop drafting for sheer talent and position need and start drafting on potential and shots in the dark. Thus, by keeping the 18th pick, we keep our picks' appeal to other teams, even if it isn't a extreme player talent upgrade. In the end, we lose two shots in the dark and get a better prospect. Sure, Cole Aldrich might not be as good as Larry Sanders, but he's still better than B.J. Mullens. And he just might prove us all wrong and become the backup center that we need. So I'll give this trade a solid B for the Thunder, and a C- for the Hornets, because I don't think they're going to do much with the cap space they saved.

Community Takes:

Aldrich is a good fit

He can dominate the paint and he needs to work on his free throw shooting.

Peterson is an expiring contract which is either trade bait or he’ll add some depth at the 2. I see him as a three point situational guy.

I DO think the Thunder gave up too much if they had to take on Peterson’s contract, but holy moly you guys act like the world is ending.

The Thunder still have a solid team. Hasn’t Presti build a solid team so far? Don’t you trust him to make smart decisions.

lol chill people

everyone wants a flashy sexy pick

a guy who can do backflip dunks, etc. Look, the Thunder have plenty of stars and scorers. They needed a guy with a good basketball IQ who positions himself well around the basket and can rebound the ball. They just got that.

People fall in love with a pick and don’t trust the GM who’s built this team from a cellar dweller to a highly competitive team.

-dishingoutdimes

Kansas Players

always have reduced offensive numbers in college because the level of talent overall is much higher. that’s why aldrich’s numbers went down last year compared to the year before, because the rest of the team improved immensely. you’re talking about a guy who was playing with definitely two and possibly four other nba guys almost the entire game

-PhillyJayhawk

Aldrich will be a very good post defender. He can rebound at a high rate, he’s got good length, very high bball IQ. He plays within his strengths. He’s more than athletic enough, I believe he tested pretty similarly to Cousins and Monroe at the combine.

He can actually shoot a bit as well so he won’t completely clog up the lane.

He’s got good shot blocking instincts as well.

-ThunderHorn

Pick #18

With the 18th Pick in the 2010 NBA Draft, the Oklahoma City Thunder Select....Eric Bledsoe, from the University of Kentucky.

Analysis: This pick or Eric Maynor will obviously be traded. There's no way the Thunder will have 3 legitimate point guards competing for two spots in the rotation.

Community Takes:

whaaaaaaaaa?

were trading this for sure thn, right?

-rickpidero

bledsoe over bradley, anderson or pleiss is not good…maybe we are dealing him?

-mleech352

Trade #3: The Oklahoma City Thunder Trade Pick #18 (Eric Bledsoe) to the Los Angeles Clippers for a future first-round draft pick.

Thunder Gain: A potentially lucrative pick down the line, and lose a controversy at PG.

Clippers Gain: A potential answer to their current PG problem.

Analysis: The Thunder are basically rolling the dice with this one. The roster is getting crowded and the Thunder knew it, so they had to start figuring out what to do with some of the loose ends. Here, they give up the 18 pick for a future first round pick of a franchise that has never won their division. We won't see the fruits of this one right now, but it's absolutely genius from where I'm looking. The Clippers are desperately looking a solution to their PG problem. Baron Davis is often injured, Steve Blake is a 3 Point Specialist, and in the past they've had to give D-Leaguers regular minutes. But they've pretty much killed themselves by hoping the future will turn out brightly for what is a very old team that has never meshed well. Bottom Line: Presti Strikes again. Thunder: A, Clippers: D Update: It's Top 10 Protected, according to Doug Gottlieb. I'll downgrade it to a B+ for the Thunder, and a C- for the Clippers, but it's still a solid move.

Community Takes:

This is going

To screw us over when the Clippers finally get good :/

-GoHornsGo90

I'm totally, absolutely okay with this

-Spencer Pan

I'm fine with it too.

-ElectricPencils

Trade #4: The Atlanta Hawks Trade Pick #31 (Tibor Pleiss) to the Oklahoma City Thunder for Cash Considerations (Rumoured to be close to 3 Million).

Hawks Gain: Cap Room.

Thunder Gain: A prospect they have been targeting for a while.

Analysis: Since none of us are connected to the wallet of Mr. Clayton I Bennett, the discussion of this trade starts and ends with whether you like Pleiss. I do. This trade gets a B+ for the Thunder, a D+ for the Hawks.

Community Takes:

This is an awesome move

It’s like the ultimate zero-downside move

-Spencer Pan

well that makes draft night better, but at his size he should be here for 2 years cause he really needs to physically develop.

-mleech352

Trade #5: The Miami Heat Trade Pick #48 (Latavious Williams) to the Oklahoma City Thunder for a future second round draft pick.

Thunder Get: A prospect that they've had a chance to review in the D-League for a year.

Heat Get: More Cap Space, and a shot in the dark down the line.

Analysis: For those who don't know, Latavious Williams opted not to go to college. Instead of playing a year in Europe, ala Brandon Jennings, he signed with the 66ers, since the D-League has no age limit. Thus, he was eligible for the NBA draft this year, and the Thunder wanted him. They got him, for minimal cost. The Heat now have more cap room. All in all, not much will come out of this. Both teams get a C.

Community Take:

Bought Latavious Williams with the 48th pick. Which is interesting because Alabi, Ryan Richards, and Willie Warren were still available.

-DaddyDai

Trade #6: The Oklahoma City Thunder Trade Pick #51 (Magnum Rolle) to the Indiana Pacers for Pick #57 (Ryan Reid) and Cash.

Pacers Get: Bleh.

Thunder Get: Bleh. Plus Cash!

Analysis: If this trade matters somewhere down the line other than the fact that it helped pay for Pleiss, I'll smash a watermelon over my head and upload it to the front page of this website. That is all.

Community Take:

Drafted Magnum Rolle 51, then traded his rights for the 57th pick and cash. (likely to pay for Pleiss)

Drafted someone Ryan Reid guy with the 57th. I doubt he’ll ever join the team.

-DaddyDai

Overall:

The 21st Pick
The 26th Pick
The 32nd Pick
The 51st Pick

Turns Into:

Cole Aldrich
Clippers Future First Round Pick (Top 10 Protected)
Tibor Pleiss
Morris Peterson
Daequan Cook
Latavious Williams
Ryan Reid

How much you like this draft really depends on how much you like Aldrich. If you like Aldrich, your opinion might tend to be a bit on the sunny side, and vice versa. Everything else is a big maybe. We might not see Pleiss for a couple of years. The Clippers pick could be years down the line. Peterson and Cook could be gone at any time. And Williams and Reid are longshots at best.

But, overall, I'm feeling good. We got a lottery prospect, two solid rotation players, another pick to stash, and someone who could be the next Serge Ibaka surprise. So I'll have to rate this draft night a solid B+.

Overall Community Take:

I feel as though we def. addressed our major holes. Pleiss will either go overseas for a few years or he will come now and compete with Aldrich, Ibaka, Collison, etc for time at the 5. All that competition will improve our big men so much. However, i dont think that we will be hanging on to Collison much longer. He has been great for us but has a very valuable 2011 expiring deal and many of those who missed out on lebron his year will be waiting til 2011 to make a splash. Also: i see us keeping cook but either buying out mo pete or trading him elsewhere. Cook is a very underrated move we made. Cook can come in with no pressure to be a scorer. With our current team, we can put the ball in the basket for sure. Cook can come off the bench and make threes for our team which was our second biggest hole last season. Next, i love the move to acquire a future first rounder from the clippers. Sure, it may turn out to be an end of the round pick if the clippers end up snagging lebron or someone else and improving tremendously but history shows that holding a clippers pick in the first round is an excellent asset. But what i liked most is that we went out and got Aldrich. He honestly did not cost us that much and we were able to obtain a true 5 who can do what we need most despite the fact that he def wasnt the sexy pick we were all dying for. Aldrich can come in, rebound, plug up the lane a bit, block shots, and make a low post move. Next to Ibaka, i feel as though we have a good low post tandem that can compliment Durant, Harden, and Westbrook. Call me what you want but Jeff Green should now be our super sixth man. Just think: Bringing in Jeff Green with the second unit, where he can be the focal point of the offense, holding down the fort while giving KD and Russ a rest! He could be a more consistent, younger, OKC version of lamar odom. That could scare some but think of how great that would be! However, Presti is far from done making moves before the start of next season.

-kpugh

What are your thoughts on the draft? How did the Thunder do? Leave a comment, drop a vote!

Also, stay tuned for details on our new players.

Poll
How would you rate Draft Night 2010 for the Thunder?
A
132 votes
B
135 votes
C
35 votes
D
3 votes
F
8 votes

313 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 24 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I said B

but really it’s more like B-/C+

I hope I’m wrong and Aldrich dominates the paint. At the very least, I hope he provides some defense that is lacking in Krstic.

Follow me on Twitter (Kevin Durant does!) @electricpencils

by ElectricPencils on Jun 25, 2010 6:26 PM CDT reply actions  

I would have done +/-

but it would have taken up too much space on the home page. I hope I’m wrong too.

Tony.psd = Da Man
Manager of Welcome to Loud City
#1 Warriors, Thunder, and Adonal Foyle Fan

by Zorgon on Jun 25, 2010 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

He'll be better than Krstic.

At least on defense and rebounding.

Loud City Resident
21: Sanders, 26: J Crawford, 32: J. Jordan. 51: G.Vasquez
La cucaracha no tiene nada pa' fumar porque Z-Bo.

by daddydai on Jun 25, 2010 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I posted this comment last night but I will post it again...

   The fact of the matter is we need a big man and some bench help. Were actually in a very good situation as the main thing we need is AGE AND EXPERIENCE. Next year we will another year older. I’m sure all of the guys will have another year of offseason strength and conditioning under their belts.

 No one and I mean no one can predict how any of these centers will turn out. Presti took yet another big man. I’m sure in hopes that 1 of these guys turn out to do something. Presti hasn’t made a bad decision yet IMO.

I think we all need to remember he knows far more than we know about these guys as it pertains to their health,attitudes etc. After July 1st we will have the best player arguably in the entire NBA locked up for quite sometime. We have a great arena, fanbase, and practice facility not to mention a solid Head coach. Contractually were still doing really well. We have an owner that is dedicated to winning and giving us the best "show" possible.

Almost every team in the NBA would like to have what we have in terms of talent and facilities. I think we as fans are trying to "force" winning a bit, when in reality we should take a deep breathe and let things happen naturally. Presti will get us there….. I believe in him!!!

I would sleep with Blou if it meant the Cubs would win a WS. by Doggie Stalker on Aug 22, 2009 4:11 PM EDT

by cubsluver22 on Jun 25, 2010 8:12 PM CDT reply actions  

Sorry I missed it.

Tony.psd = Da Man
Manager of Welcome to Loud City
#1 Warriors, Thunder, and Adonal Foyle Fan

by Zorgon on Jun 26, 2010 3:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

This draft is another extension of Sam Presti’s team building philosophy. He could have very easily went into free agency and competed for the services of a known product. Instead, he exchanged about $8 million (when all is said and done, assuming Kyle Weaver is waived) of our cap space for Cole Aldrich and some change.

If Cole Aldrich wins a starting spot over Nenad Krstic, this move works in Sam Presti’s universe. It’s much better to get Cole Aldrich on a rookie scale than to pursue Brendan Haywood. However, this draft tells me that Sam Presti isn’t actively looking for an upgrade for our offense. He’s going to put his eggs into the Jeff Green, James Harden, Serge Ibaka basket and hope another high efficiency option emerges offensively.

I don’t think Cole Aldrich is a bad selection. He’s a top rebounder in college, and rebounding is something that most often translates to the pros. One of our biggest weaknesses, especially against teams like the Lakers, is defensive rebounding. Aldrich does a lot to shore this up. Shot blocking is another thing that translates well, especially shot blocking without fouling (which Cole Aldrich is great at). He’s a smart player who knows how to use his body defensively, though he could use a bit more mass. Conceptually, this fits Sam Presti’s vision pretty well, at a much cheaper price than, say, Brendan Haywood. Or even Tyson Chandler.

The real question is whether or not Sam Presti’s concept is viable. We haven’t added anything to our offense. We lack a high efficiency scorer outside of Kevin Durant and we saw the brutal truth of what a one dimensional offense looks like against a good defensive team in the playoffs. Presti is probably thinking there’s enough offense on our roster. We’ll see if he’s correct.

by slick watts on Jun 25, 2010 8:45 PM CDT reply actions  

I somewhat disagree

You question Presti’s concept and whether or not he should have went into FA armed with the same money he spent in the draft.

Let’s don’t act like that going into Free agency with money and interest is a guarantee to any certain player. Let’s also not act like he has a choice of players in the draft. He drafts based on the slot dealt to him. I’m quite sure a NBA gm explored every option humanly possible in order to obtain the best possible player.

All of a sudden it seems like everyone is overly critical of Presti’s expertise as if he hasn’t turned water into wine every since he’s been here. Presti has done a wonderful job of putting his best foot forward and giving every player as well as this team the best chance to suceeed.

by cubsluver22 on Jun 25, 2010 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Presti doesn’t seem interested in big money free agency. That’s fine, but building a team ‘organically’ (as he would say it) is tough work that is very hit or miss. He’s doing an excellent job of building a team this way. Cole Aldrich is solid, fills some needs, and fits into his vision nicely.

To me, though, most successful teams get that way from acquiring some kind of proven lynchpin in free agency or trade. Consider these recent conference finalists / champions:

- Pau Gasol and the Lakers
- Kevin Garnett / Ray Allen and the Celtics
- Jason Richardson / Steve Nash and the Suns
- Shaquille O’neal and the Heat
- Ben Wallace / Rip Hamilton / practically the whole Detroit Pistons roster
- Shaquille Oneal and the Lakers
- and many more…

The one big exception is, of course, the Spurs. They got very lucky with two low selections (Ginobili, Parker) and with Tim Duncan himself (and Robinson coming back from injury).

I admire and like Sam Presti’s decisions and how he’s building the team, but he’s clearly trying to buck the trend. With all the cap space we have, and th elimited window with which to use it, we could go the way of many other successful teams and attempt to bring in outside help. But Presti wants to do it his way. As a fan, that’s exciting and I like it. Hopefully it works.

by slick watts on Jun 25, 2010 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Let's not forget

Oklahoma City isn’t high up on the list of places big names wanna go. See Charles Barkley’s commentary!

by cubsluver22 on Jun 26, 2010 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Offense

Perhaps Presti believes that the current crew can deliver more? Durant is a solid offensive player. Green and Harden have show flashes of offensive they just need to be consistent. Even though Westbrook can be reckless at times he can penetrate well and his mid range shot has improved dramatically this past year.

I feel Cook was brought in for offensive. If Cook can return to his former game Presti will have stolen quite an asset from Miami.

Peterson in the past has been a decent perimeter shooter, but I feel he is mainly here for a short term leadership role. If they don’t get rid of him before the season starts.

Loud City Resident

The tooth fairy must have a thing for Cole Aldrich.
His tooth keeps disappearing and reappearing.

by daddydai on Jun 25, 2010 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

James Harden and Russell Westbrook are the two guys that will have to step to the plate. They obviously want Russell to be involved in the scoring. If that’s the case, Russ has to shoot much more efficiently. James Harden is a fairly efficient scorer, but he doesn’t get the minutes to make a huge impact. Our low efficiency backcourt (among the lowest in the league) is a big reason we struggle to create offense at times.

It is certainly possible that some of the guys can step up. But there’s going to have to be better coaching offensively and we need a legitimate number two option offensively behind Kevin Durant. That’s either Westbrook or Harden; but they both need to improve to get there.

by slick watts on Jun 25, 2010 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

B to B+

This is a very solid draft. We started out with the 21, 26, 32, and 51. We turn that into Aldrich, Cook, Pleiss, Williams, Reid, and a future 1st. Not a bad night.

Aldrich
There was no way we could get into the top 5 to get Cousins/Monroe without trading Green and probably another key piece, however, we needed a center and we got the 2nd best true center. Among centers he ranks 1st in defensive rebounds/40 minutes(ahead of Cousins thats right) and he ranks 3rd in blocks/40 minutes(behind Whiteside and N’Diaye). He does 2 things very well rebound and defend the rim and thats what we need. We ranked 17th in defensive rebounding rate last year. We got killed on the defensive boards by LA. Aldrich will help us in that department in a big way. He’ll also be a very good shot blocker. He’s an above average athlete and he’s got tremendous length.

Offensively, he’s not going to give us much, but he doesn’t need to. He has the ability to pick n pop. He will be good in the pick-n-roll game as well. He’s got soft hands and nice touch around the rim. He’s also a pretty good FT shooter at 73%. He needs work on his offensive game there’s no doubt but he’s got the ability to contribute in this area. He should get 10 points based on lobs, pick-n-rolls, FTs, and put backs.

He’s obviously not the flashy pick we all wanted. He’s gonna need to fill out and add some weight as well as get stronger but he has the frame to do so. Obviously he needs to improve offensively as well but he’s shown some ability. His ceiling isn’t incredibly high but he can definitely be a strong starting center in this league. At worst he’s the backup C for the next 10 years, which means he’ll have a lot of value.

Pleiss
Don’t know much about him but he seems like a big with a lot of potential. 7-1, mobile, above-average athlete, with good length. Seems to have some skill and will mix it up inside for boards and on defense. If he can develop he could end up being the starting C.

Williams, Reid
Williams is a guy that OKC likes a lot from Tulsa and they want to keep him around. Reid was about getting money back from buying Pleiss’ rights.

Future 1st(top 10 protected)
The Clippers had a good draft but its been 40 years of losing culture over there, 30 of it under Donald Sterling’s ownership. They are the Clippers. Does anyone really expect it to change? They’ve made the playoffs 4 times in the 30 years that Sterling has owned them and 7 years total. We traded Bledsoe who likely wouldn’t have seen much time here for whats going to more than likely be a lottery pick. Since 1990 they’ve had 14 top 10 picks. 14/21, and only a couple of times did they have picks past 16.

I also don’t see how this screws us over if the Clippers somehow become decent. We didn’t give up a draft pick. We picked up an extra pick. How exactly does that screw us over?

Overall solid draft, with the potential to be very good depending on what Aldrich and Pleiss do.

by ThunderHorn on Jun 25, 2010 9:37 PM CDT reply actions  

One more point

Had Seraphin been there at 18, Presti would have taken him. I also believe the same to be true for Sanders.

by ThunderHorn on Jun 25, 2010 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

So for the Clippers thing

They don’t give us the pick any year it’s in the top 10? That includes #10 I’m assuming? Then do we get to choose whichever year we take their pick (I.e. pray they get 11th in the lottery some year and take it then) if it’s not in the top 10?

by GoHornsGo90 on Jun 26, 2010 2:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Protected picks usually get transferred to the following year...

if they fall within the protected range. I’m guessing here, but it would be something like this:

2011 Draft: Top 10 Protected
2012 Draft: Top 5 Protected
2013 Draft: Unprotected

Loud City Resident

The tooth fairy must have a thing for Cole Aldrich.
His tooth keeps disappearing and reappearing.

by daddydai on Jun 26, 2010 6:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

yes, if its in the top 10, our rights to their pick transfer over to next year where the protection likely decreased to something like top 7 or top 5, and continues to decrease over the next 3-4 years until its unprotected, or it has some stipulation on its maybe top 3 protected for a couple of years in a row but if we don’t get the pick by a certain year we get 2nd round picks from them in addition to still maintaining our rights to a future 1st rounder.

Regardless it doesn’t screw us over.

by ThunderHorn on Jun 26, 2010 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Considering all the alternatives...

I’m satisfied that Presti made this choice. Everyone agrees that we need a center and Presti delivered a player that is widely considered to be the 2nd best center in this draft. Cole is also the most proven and experienced center in this draft. The kid had 9.8 rebounds and 3.5 blocks a game against the NCAA toughest competition. Heck the kid laid down a triple double (20 boards, 10 blocks, 13 points) in the 2009 NCAA tourney. Would anyone here really rather have Alabi or Orton instead?

My biggest gripe was about Cole’s measurements, I’ve since heard that he has measured better in other pre-draft workouts.

I’m also happy that Presti attempted to land Sanders or Seraphin (or so it seemed).

Loud City Resident
21: Sanders, 26: J Crawford, 32: J. Jordan. 51: G.Vasquez
La cucaracha no tiene nada pa' fumar porque Z-Bo.

by daddydai on Jun 25, 2010 9:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Cole’s measurements are fine IMO… 9’3" reach is more than enough to play center capably. Here are the centers that made the All Star team this year: He’s longer than Chris Kaman and Tyson Chandler. People get too crazy about height. Height is not important, you don’t play ball with the top of your head. Aldrich is fine at center, he just needs to put on maybe 10 lbs.

by slick watts on Jun 25, 2010 9:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

er it cut off my All Star center list. Suffice to say he compares favorably to a lot of them. :)

by slick watts on Jun 25, 2010 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thundermob?
KDthunderup: Welcome @mopete24 to the #thundermob…we are brothers not just teammates!!

Loud City Resident

The tooth fairy must have a thing for Cole Aldrich.
His tooth keeps disappearing and reappearing.

by daddydai on Jun 25, 2010 10:21 PM CDT reply actions  

Clips fan here

You guys had a good draft, and this was an excellent write-up. But I noticed there is some misinformation about the Clip Show going on over here… particularly this:

But they’ve pretty much killed themselves by hoping the future will turn out brightly for what is a very old team that has never meshed well.

The team currently has 5 players under contract, plus Aminu, Bledsoe, and Warren, as well as the rights to Sofokilis Schortsantis. Of these 9 players, only 1 is over 30, 2 others are over 25, and the rest are 21 and under. If we can get a good coach, it’s highly likely you guys could be getting a higher pick than you expect.

by losbolts on Jun 27, 2010 1:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Yes...

you have a much better looking team, but we are basing our assumption on the Clips history and ownership.

Loud City Resident

The tooth fairy must have a thing for Cole Aldrich.
His tooth keeps disappearing and reappearing.

by daddydai on Jun 27, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Clippers fan?

I’m sorry for you, but I didn’t think Clippers fans actually existed.

Whoever posted that they are an old team is wrong but the fact remains its the Clippers…in the 30 years Sterling has owned the team you’ve been to the playoffs 4 times. 14 out of the last 21 drafts you’ve had a top 10 pick. History would say we’ve got a damn good chance of having a lottery pick.

by ThunderHorn on Jun 27, 2010 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions  


User Tools

Your SB Nation source for everything you could possibly want to know about the Oklahoma City Thunder. Quote to live by: "Taquitos, chicken wings, roasty toasties and beer. If I had a little more time, I would have done something more grandiose."

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Thunder Up SON!!!!
Ryan_2008_small
Could Durant Surpass Lebron?
Small
ESPN's Must-see Harden tee
Screen_shot_2012-04-qqqq02_at_6
James Harden "Fear the Beard" Wallpaper
Small
Forget about Miami
Small
My shout out to the Thunder
Screen_shot_2012-04-qqqq02_at_6
Kevin Durant "Game Winner" Wallpaper
Small
Hunter and Player Executive Committee to Call for Fisher’s Resignation.
Small
ThunderUp Podcast
Opgs-49789-mid_small
No Best Record? Don't Worry!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow WTLC on Twitter

Twitter-3_medium

Follow WTLC on Facebook

47 - 19

0

Won 4

14

Northwest Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
Oklahoma City 47 19 .712 0 Won 4
Denver 38 28 .575 9 Lost 1
Utah 36 30 .545 11 Lost 4
Portland 28 38 .424 19 Lost 7
Minnesota 26 40 .393 21 Lost 2

(updated 5.17.2012 at 9:26 PM CDT)

Seattle Supersonics Blogs

Loud City - Bring The Thunder (Rafter Banner)

Rafterbannersmall_medium


Founders/Main Writers

Mestylin__small Zorgon

Alec_guiness_small okluschen

Dogbert2 J.A. Sherman

Podcast Partners

Thundercast-logo_small okcthundercast

Contributing Writers

Green_small illfreaky911

Mvealpha_small MVEAlpha

Okc4_small Fakin

Hallofthegods_small Spencer Pan

Reffeet_small Jessica Lantz

Me_rocket_small ZorgonB

Small DaraMirzaie