Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Two Minutes Of Thunder Basketball Wins The Game

What if we drafted....Stanley Robinson? (Featuring Andrew Porter of The UConn Blog)

Uconn-xl_medium

This is a feature that we'll roll out as often as possible leading up to the draft. Basically, we'll be taking an in depth look at some of the potential draftees for the Thunder, and asking questions of the people who know them best, the college blogs that cover them. Up now is Stanley Robinson of the University of Connecticut, and Andrew Porter of The UConn Blog. Scott Schroeder of Ridiculous Upside has him available at #21, but NBADraft.net has him being available as late as #32. Regardless, he is a potential future Thunder player, so here's the 411 on Stanley Robinson....

0708_uconn_robinson_stanley_medium

Stanley Robinson, Small Forward, #21, The University of Connecticut


Highlights against Chattanooga in the NCAA Tournament


Q&A, Andrew Porter, The UConn Blog

1. What type of player is Stanley Robinson?
Robinson, affectionately known as Sticks, is an athletic freak. He has immense physical talents and can jump out of the building, and has a decent shooting touch (he shot 34% from 3 as a senior). However, Robinson is also maddeningly inconsistent, with a tendency to disappear in close games. He'll put up 15 points and grab as many rebounds in one game, and then only score 6 points the next.
Below: What will Stanley Robinson's Career look like? Is he the next Rudy Gay?

Star-divide

2. Based on what you know, do you think he'll be an NBA caliber player? If so, who would you compare him to?
Robinson has the physical tools to be a valuable asset in the NBA, but he needs to find a way to play consistently. The closest comparison might be UConn alum Rudy Gay. Robinson is not as talented as Gay, but both had careers at UConn that featured remarkable physical gifts and incredibly frustrating consistency issues. Gay has blossomed in the NBA, and I wonder if the league's environment will be a better fit for Sticks as well.

3. Based on what you know, do you think he would be a good fit for the Thunder?
Its hard to say. Again, it all comes down to him playing at a consistent level. He has physical tools to be a big asset for anyone, he just has to figure out how to use them.

4. Do you think Robinson will drop to pick #26, or do you think he'll go before that?
I don't know enough to say definitively, but being picked somewhere in the mid-20's would not surprise me.

5. The Thunder are a very disciplined squad with a team mentality. Do you think Stanley Robinson would fit into that type of environment, or would he be too wild or selfish?
I think the team mentality would be a great fit. Robinson was always a team player at UConn, and was often too deferential. Having a nice comfortable role (instead of needing to be a leader) might be just what he needs. The disciplined part is a bit of a dicier proposition though. Robinson never showed that he had all that high of a basketball IQ. He's got tremendous physical skills, but his tendency to disappear on the court will be frustrating if he can't shake it.

6. Do you want to see him play for the Thunder, unite with other former UConn players, or go somewhere else?
I'd like to see Sticks wind up in an environment that will allow his talent to grow. I think he'll do well in the NBA. He probably won't be an all-star, but he'll be a valuable piece for someone. If he does wind up with the Thunder, he might get the chance to play with UConn alum Kevin Ollie, assuming Ollie is back with the team next year.

7. What is your favorite Stanley Robinson moment? (YouTube link if possible/applicable?)
When I say Robinson is an athletic freak, I mean it. Search for him on YouTube and you'll find dozens of spectacular dunks. You can check out this alley-oop over Texas as an example.

8. In your opinion, what would be a best case scenario and a worst case scenario for Stanley Robinson's NBA Career?
Best case: Robinson thrives in the NBA environment and is able to put physical skill set to use while overcoming some of his mental blocks. It is unlikely he will be a team's star, but he could be a valuable second or third option.
Worst case: Robinson never gets over his inconsistency issues and still disappears on the court. His physical talents will keep him in the league a few years, but then it might be off to Europe.

Many thanks to Andrew Sharp for the in-depth analysis. So, what do you think? Is Stanley Robinson a good pick or a bad pick? Will he be worth the risk in the first round? Even in the second round? Let us know by dropping a comment!

See Also: Larry Sanders Profile, Solomon Alabi Profile.

Poll
Do you think Stanley Robinson would be a good fit for the Thunder?
Absolutely!
28 votes
He's not worth the risk at #21, but I'd take a shot at him at #26.
39 votes
Only as a second rounder.
33 votes
There's no way I'd take him, he's too inconsistent.
10 votes
There's no way I'd take him, his game won't fit into our system.
11 votes

121 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 21 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Not interested.

Follow me on Twitter (Kevin Durant does!) @electricpencils

by ElectricPencils on May 19, 2010 7:34 PM CDT reply actions  

I think the Thunder should draft

Solomon Alabi, Nemanja Bjelica, and Greivis Vasquez. Alabi and Bjelica are projects, but I think they could be good in the future. Vasquez could be effective also.

"Who Wants some pudding pops?, delicious and nutritious!

by MJ5 on May 20, 2010 1:34 AM CDT reply actions  

What i would like to know is

Despite being a Bulls fan, i really enjoyed watching this young team play, especially in the playoffs againts the Lakers. My question to all your Thunder fans is, now that the Thunder improved way more faster than anyone thought they would, do you think your team can afford drafting a player that’s considered kind of a project (like the above mentioned Alabi), or shouldn’t they try to go after “ready” players that may offer a immediate impact? What do you think?

by Dubbel on May 20, 2010 5:30 AM CDT reply actions  

Good Question.

We have concerns that need to be addressed now. Such as a legit post player and perimeter shooting. I would prefer an impact player, but I feel we would have to trade up to draft such a player.

If there are no trades made, I think we will get a combination of both project and impact players.

Loud City Resident - Barring trade, I see this happening:
21: Kevin Seraphin, 26: Paul George, 32: Jerome Jordan. 51: Dwayne Collins
Concerning Bron, Bosh, and Boozer. I could care less.

by daddydai on May 20, 2010 8:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

What about

Luke Babbit of Nevada? He has good height for a shooter (41% 3pt) and seems like a good all-around-type of player who also can rebound. Maybe if he falls to your team at # 26? Draftexpress has him taken at # 20. You think your team may take him at # 21?

by Dubbel on May 20, 2010 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

I do think we want more of an impact player than a project

I’ll be disappointed if we don’t improve somehow next season. I don’t think a project player will help us do that.

Follow me on Twitter (Kevin Durant does!) @electricpencils

by ElectricPencils on May 20, 2010 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not really interested either.

BTW – Chad Ford has OKC drafting Donatas Montajunas(sp?) and Solomon Alabi at 21 and 26. Even though I’m not big on Alabi, I’d be happy to get 2 decent 7-footers in the draft.

Loud City Resident - Barring trade, I see this happening:
21: Kevin Seraphin, 26: Paul George, 32: Jerome Jordan. 51: Dwayne Collins
Concerning Bron, Bosh, and Boozer. I could care less.

by daddydai on May 20, 2010 8:11 AM CDT reply actions  

One of the draft sites

is projecting us to take 4 guards. I’ll be glad when those things start giving me a more accurate picture of what’s going on.

Follow me on Twitter (Kevin Durant does!) @electricpencils

by ElectricPencils on May 20, 2010 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Donatas Motiejunas

is interesting but from all indications it sounds like (I’ve never seen him play, ever) he’s pretty much all offensive tools and zero defense. Seven feet is nice, but I’ll take more physical play and defense on the interior first. Who knows how it’ll all shake out though.

by Spencer Pan on May 20, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Additionally

He’ll probably pull out if he doesn’t think he’ll be taken in the lottery, so it becomes pretty much a moot point.

by Spencer Pan on May 20, 2010 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

negative..

this would not be a mistake but would be in my opinion a poor use of our picks…we (the thunder) have 4 picks in this draft…we were shown to have too few big bodies in the playoffs this season…if we had a few more and could continue to maintain and develop our young core, we could be a darkhorse for next years championship…we would at least be set to move past the first round of the playoffs!

i suggest three names: larry sanders, solomon alabi, and jarvis varnado (sp?). these 3 guys should be available for our first three picks in the draft. by picking up these 3, we provide depth and defense to our front line…imagine a backcourt of ibaka and sanders! no you wont be overwhelmed by their offensive scoring power, but imagine the defense and shot blocking! then you add in collison, alabi, and varnado off the bench and you have a very good start at the post. these guys could turn into a defensive powerhouse with the right coaching, some bulking up, and experience.

we do not need too much extra offense. in fact by adding these players, i feel as though we still add offense. if we make these moves, here is a possible lineup:
pg-westbrook (backup maynor who helped develop sanders at vcu)
sg-sefolosha (backup harden, your offensive spark off the bench)
sf-durant (backup green, future sixth man of the year)
pf-sanders (backup collison, underrated energy guy)
c-ibaka (backup alabi, mullens…both projects but promising backups!)

we then hold quite a bit of caproom to hold our core intact…sign extensions next offseason…make a few savvy moves (which presti has shown to be a master at)…or even take a few of our picks and trade up into maybe even the top ten to a team with alot of holes…the possibilities are endless and this team could be drastically improved with just these three picks with a fourth to be used on offense at the 2 or 3 position..

thoughts? comments? please give me feedback :)
goooooo thunder!!!!

by kpugh on May 20, 2010 6:25 PM CDT reply actions  

oh!

instead of alabi…we could also possibly pick up kevin seraphin of france…
any way you slice it though, we NEED more big men who can play some D!

by kpugh on May 20, 2010 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

defense...

I like the pickup of Alabi and Sanders.

However, Alabi would eventually be the starting C and Ibaka would be the PF. Ibaka is much more PF than C. Sanders would be great coming off the bench as the backup PF/C.

Green likely moves to the 6th man role, Harden moves into the starting lineup to provide more shooting.

PG – Westbrook (backup Maynor)
SG – Harden (backup either Sef or someone else)
SF – KD (backup Green)
PF – Ibaka (Sanders)
C – Alabi (Sanders)

We’d likely need to bring in someone else for depth at the PF/C spot, and hopefully bring in a shooter like Korver.

by ThunderHorn on May 20, 2010 6:50 PM CDT reply actions  

I was talking to some friends of Westbrook

and threw out the idea of Green being a 6th man. They laughed pretty hard at the idea and indicated Jeff would probably not be into it.

Of course, I know they don’t speak for him.

Follow me on Twitter (Kevin Durant does!) @electricpencils

by ElectricPencils on May 20, 2010 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah...

he likely wouldn’t be into it but he’s no PF and KD is no SG so something has to be done.

Can’t blame him for wanting to be a starter. He’s a starting caliber SF but he’s on the same team as one of the top 5 one of the top 5 players(at worst top 10) in the NBA that just happens to play his position.

Presti and the FO along with Jeff are going to have to make a tough call. Presti and Brooks on wether they feel they can legitimately win with Green at PF(I don’t think so unless you get Dwight Howard @ C). With the hopefully development of Ibaka that puts Green in a tough situation. He’s gonna have to decide whats more important: Trying to win a title as part of this team but as the 6th man against trying to win a title elsewhere as a starter.

I’m a big Green fan, I love what he brings to the table, but he isn’t a PF.

One possible solution to keep Green around would be for KD to gradually move to PF while Green goes to SF. KD is 6’10"(maybe a little taller) and has a ridiculous wingspan and reach. With more weight and strength he can likely play PF.

by ThunderHorn on May 20, 2010 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really like this

As long as Thabo and Green get big minutes off the bench.

by JoCro on May 20, 2010 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree, but the likelihood of drafting Sanders and Alabi is very low.

Loud City Resident - Barring trade, I see this happening:
21: Kevin Seraphin, 26: Paul George, 32: Jerome Jordan. 51: Dwayne Collins
Concerning Bron, Bosh, and Boozer. I could care less.

by daddydai on May 20, 2010 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ryan Richards name is going to explode on the Mocks soon.

He did very well at the draft combine this morning. Richards is a 19 year old 6’11" center hailing from London.

Loud City Resident - Barring trade, I see this happening:
21: Kevin Seraphin, 26: Paul George, 32: Jerome Jordan. 51: Dwayne Collins
Concerning Bron, Bosh, and Boozer. I could care less.

by daddydai on May 20, 2010 10:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Thanks for the tip

Any other combine rumors/news?

Follow me on Twitter (Kevin Durant does!) @electricpencils

by ElectricPencils on May 21, 2010 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I saw that

I like Jerome Jordan’s numbers.

Follow me on Twitter (Kevin Durant does!) @electricpencils

by ElectricPencils on May 21, 2010 7:03 PM CDT reply actions  


User Tools

Your SB Nation source for everything you could possibly want to know about the Oklahoma City Thunder. Quote to live by: "Taquitos, chicken wings, roasty toasties and beer. If I had a little more time, I would have done something more grandiose."

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Thunder Up SON!!!!
Ryan_2008_small
Could Durant Surpass Lebron?
Small
ESPN's Must-see Harden tee
Screen_shot_2012-04-qqqq02_at_6
James Harden "Fear the Beard" Wallpaper
Small
Forget about Miami
Small
My shout out to the Thunder
Screen_shot_2012-04-qqqq02_at_6
Kevin Durant "Game Winner" Wallpaper
Small
Hunter and Player Executive Committee to Call for Fisher’s Resignation.
Small
ThunderUp Podcast
Opgs-49789-mid_small
No Best Record? Don't Worry!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow WTLC on Twitter

Twitter-3_medium

Follow WTLC on Facebook

47 - 19

0

Won 4

14

Northwest Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
Oklahoma City 47 19 .712 0 Won 4
Denver 38 28 .575 9 Lost 1
Utah 36 30 .545 11 Lost 4
Portland 28 38 .424 19 Lost 7
Minnesota 26 40 .393 21 Lost 2

(updated 5.17.2012 at 9:26 PM CDT)

Seattle Supersonics Blogs

Loud City - Bring The Thunder (Rafter Banner)

Rafterbannersmall_medium


Founders/Main Writers

Mestylin__small Zorgon

Alec_guiness_small okluschen

Dogbert2 J.A. Sherman

Podcast Partners

Thundercast-logo_small okcthundercast

Contributing Writers

Green_small illfreaky911

Mvealpha_small MVEAlpha

Okc4_small Fakin

Hallofthegods_small Spencer Pan

Reffeet_small Jessica Lantz

Me_rocket_small ZorgonB

Small DaraMirzaie