Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kentucky Basketball: Where the Wildcats Stand as of Today

Western Conference Quarter-Finals Game 1 Recap: Los Angeles Lakers 87, Oklahoma City 79

Yahoo! Sports Box Score:

I can't say I'm surprised.

Nobody can say they were surprised. Not even the most die hard Thunder fan really expected us to win and would be devastated by this loss.

And obviously, the local media is going to do all it can to iterate that this was a good loss, a learning experience, a blah this and a blah that. In truth, though, it was just a loss. It was bad. We could have won, and we should have won. But, admittedly, the reason we did lose was because we were young.

Early on, the Thunder looked like deer in the headlights. The Lakers created their lead by driving to the basket down low, and they pulled away with three back-to-back threes. After this disastrous first quarter, the Thunder almost looked dead in the beginning of the 2nd, falling behind by 17. But the, individual players started to shine through. Collison brought his veteran presence. Westbrook starting driving to the hole so fast that he was almost like Sonic the Hedgehog. When it was all said and done, we were within 8 points at the start of the half.

The rest of the game was competitive, like it should have been. The Thunder were always threatening to come back, and at one point got it to within 6 before the start of the fourth. But they just couldn't make a run. In the end, the fact that they fell so far behind so early dug them into a big hole. This, coupled with the fact that the Thunder would make stupid mistakes whenever they would go on a run combines for a relatively uneventful loss.

Below: Analysis, Awards

Star-divide

On the Thunder's side of things, I'd identify out main problem as being James Harden. He normally averages 10 Points, we lost by 8 points, and he scored 0. Often, he'd get trapped outside the arc with nowhere to go with the ball, because he had already used up his dribble. He needs to either drive, shoot, or pass and not stand there holding the ball.

That being said, the Lakers also had their own problem offensively in Ron Artest. He went 3 of 11 from the field, including 1 of 8 from beyond the arc. And we're not talking about hard fought, contested threes. Or even threes that sent him to the line. We're talking about outright bricking the open three. But, the thing is, Ron Artest more than made up for his poor offensive performance with his great defense of Kevin Durant.

Kevin Durant struggled mightily from the field, going only 7 of 24 from the field, with 9 of 11 free throws. His shot selection wasn't necessarily poor, because he usually sinks the tough shots he takes. But today, his turnaround jumpers would sometimes fall way short, or bounce off of the side of the rim.

When you look at the Box Score, each team had it's successes and pitfalls, but the Lakers seemed to do just a shade better in every category. Kobe Shot 31%, KD Shot 29%. Russell Westbrook Scored 23 Points, had 8 Assists and had 2 Steals, but Pau Gasol had 19 Points, 13 Rebounds, 3 Assists, and 3 Blocks. Krstic had 8 Points and 7 Rebounds, but Andrew Bynum had 13 and 12. Sefolosha Defended well, but Artest defended better. The list goes on.

In the end, next time, you hope that the Thunder can find a way to stay in the game early on so that their stupid mistakes don't hurt as much later on.

Anyway, on to the awards....

Thunder Wonder: Russell Westbrook, 23 Points, 4 Rebounds, 8 Assists, and 2 Steals. Russell Westbrook had a nearly flawless performance and kept the Thunder in the game tonight. It's a simple as that. This guy puts all of those "experience" arguments to bed.

Thunder Down Under: Nick Collison, 5 Points, 8 Rebounds, 2 Steals, Lots of Charges. Nick Collison provided a veteran presence in the game when nobody else was stepping up, and this game could very easily have gotten out of hand if he wasn't there on defense. Big ups to you, Nick.

Thunder Blunder: 0 Points, 0 of 3 Shooting, 1 Turnover, 4 Fouls. I hate saying it, but the only effect James Harden had on this game was bad. He was always getting trapped, a non-factor on offense, and a liability on defense. I'm sure it's a playoff debut he'd like to forget.

Thunder Plunderer: Pau Gasol, 19 Points, 7 of 14 Shooting, 13 Rebounds, 3 Assists, 3 Blocks. He didn't dominate the game by any means, but he found ways to exploit Krstic, and had a very efficiently played game. I know he's an All-Star Center, but, given that his team just scored 87, that's about all you need him to do.

Next Game: Western Conference Quarter-Finals Game 2: At the Lakers, Tuesday, April 10th, 9:30 PM Central Daylight Time.

Bring on Game 2 already!!!!

Poll
After this afternoon's performance, are you confident about Game 2?
Yeah, bring it on! I'm sure we'll win!
55 votes
Nah, the series won't heat up until it's back in Oklahoma City.
93 votes
Nah, the series is already over.
111 votes

259 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 20 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Man what a game, OKC couldn’t handle Andrew Bynum

by 15xtimeNBAchamps on Apr 18, 2010 7:02 PM CDT reply actions  

I think this game....

came on at like 5 AM here, so I missed it completely.

Loud City via Far East
boredaroundtheworld.blogspot.com

by rickpidero on Apr 18, 2010 7:32 PM CDT reply actions  

A little disappointed.

I think the Thunder proved that they can hang though. I’ll go ahead and chalk this one up to playoff rookie jitters.

by belt on Apr 18, 2010 7:51 PM CDT reply actions  

What does this game mean?

It means we can win.

We played terribly.

And we only lost by 8.

If we can settle down, play our game, get a few of those shots to fall…

We can win.

Follow me on Twitter (Kevin Durant does!) @electricpencils

by ElectricPencils on Apr 18, 2010 7:56 PM CDT reply actions  

While I don’t agree that they “played terribly” I do agree that this is attainable for the Thunder.

by belt on Apr 18, 2010 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like I said in the game thread.

I we lose within 10, I’m going to blame this one on bad calls. I’m not trying to sound like a soar loser. Westbrook’s block was clean. Durant’s inbound was good. We had 3 shooting fouls that was called on the floor. 2 should have been 3 foul shots and the other got side-outed (word?). Anyway, the Lakers won. Good game overall.

Your friendly neighborhood Loud City resident.

by daddydai on Apr 19, 2010 5:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

I = If

Your friendly neighborhood Loud City resident.

by daddydai on Apr 19, 2010 5:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know.

I saw bad calls going both ways, the refs are never going to get them all right and I don’t think they were overly unfair to either side. Just my opinion though.

by belt on Apr 19, 2010 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Terribly...

Durant was 7-24, including a few airballs and 4 turnovers.

Thabo, Maynor and Harden combined for 4 points on 1-10 shooting.

They blocked 9 of our shots and held us to 2-16 on threes.

I think the numbers make our game sound a lot better than it looked.

Follow me on Twitter (Kevin Durant does!) @electricpencils

by ElectricPencils on Apr 19, 2010 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well...

Sure if you want to base their entire performance on the fact that they didn’t shoot well (but only 6% off of their season average) then yes I guess you can say they played terribly. But the game I was watching had the Thunder outscoring the Lakers after the first quarter, dominating the Lakers in the fast break, holding one of the best players in the game to a line that was just as bad as Durant’s. I saw Westbrook run all over the Lakers the whole game and holding one of the best home teams in the game to well under their scoring average.

I hate to sound like a homer patronizing a young playoff team but if they really played terribly I don’t think anyone on this blog would be here saying that they had a chance in hell of pulling this series.

by belt on Apr 19, 2010 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Playoff...

jitters, I think we’ll learn more in game 2.

Loud City via Far East
boredaroundtheworld.blogspot.com

by rickpidero on Apr 19, 2010 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

It shows OKC big need for a big man

not just on defense, but on offense too. To be a great team OKC needs a big man who can defend, rebound, and score on the block. Green is good, but no post player. You cannot have 4 guys on the perimeter . OKC can beat good teams, but without a good post guy they will never beat great teams or get anywhere.

"Who Wants some pudding pops?, delicious and nutritious!

by MJ5 on Apr 18, 2010 9:05 PM CDT reply actions  

agreed

I think once you pick up a solid big man, your team will be among the contenders…

"Just by the aura of D.J. Mbenga being there, the shot missed."

by shaqfor3 on Apr 19, 2010 1:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

I actually think Al Jefferson would be good

He was putting up superstar numbers last year and had good numbers this year. He is not Zach Randolph. He is a better defender and more athletic. I think OKC could get him for Nenad Kristic and Collison. MInnesota is going to pick a big in the draft anyway. They wanna trade him because he and Love cannot play together, much too similar. They would want Kristic and Collison because they expire in 2011 offseason and they can cover as back up bigs so Minnesota can just add a good wing player and be better.

"Who Wants some pudding pops?, delicious and nutritious!

by MJ5 on Apr 19, 2010 1:46 AM CDT reply actions  

I'd love to do that trade

But I seriously doubt they’d ever want Krstic and Collison for Jefferson. They’ll probably go for a forward in the draft if they don’t pick #1.

Tony.psd = Da Man
Manager of Welcome to Loud City
#1 Warriors, Thunder, and Adonal Foyle Fan

by Zorgon on Apr 19, 2010 2:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Jefferson is probably out though

Either him or Love. They can’t play together, and as Rambis is instituting the triangle, that points to Love — whose skills mesh really well with the triangle — staying over Jefferson, hence the rumors that Kahn tried to swap Jefferson for Granger.

That said, I agree that Krstic and Collison is pretty low value for Jefferson, unless you started offering draft picks, which would probably go against Presti’s general philosophy.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Apr 19, 2010 3:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Jefferson is a pretty horrid defender

He doesn’t move well, is undersized if you stick him at the five, and doesn’t give consistent effort. About the only good thing is that he rebounds well. Randolph actually noticeably picked up his effort this year on the defensive end, or at least, when Memphis was competitive.

That said, few players are better on the block, and OKC desperately needs some type of scoring down low. Definitely would explore other options though.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Apr 19, 2010 3:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

What do you mean your not surprised?

in an earlier post you predicted the thunder win game 1. Was that just wishful thinking?

Kobe: "I'll do whatever it takes to win games, whether it's sitting on a bench waving a towel, handing a cup of water to a teammate, or hitting the game-winning shot."

by hrghori on Apr 19, 2010 1:33 PM CDT reply actions  

You can expect something to happen and not be surprised when it doesn’t.

by belt on Apr 19, 2010 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Egg-zacktly

Even though I predicted a Game 1 win, if the Lakers won that game and swept the series, it wouldn’t be revolutionary or anything. I wouldn’t be surprised. It’s kind of like if you predict a 14 seed to upset a 3 in the NCAA tournament, and they lose by 20. You thought the 14 seed was going to win, but, the culture surrounding the game dictated that the 3 seed was much more likely to win, so it’s not a big surprise.

Or, think of it this way. You ask to meet your friend at a restaurant. You say “Meet me at 6 o’clock sharp”. You get there at 5:55, fully expecting him to get there at 6. Unfortunately, he gets caught up at work, so he arrives late, at 6:10. It’s different than what you expected, but it’s not surprising,

Tony.psd = Da Man
Manager of Welcome to Loud City
#1 Warriors, Thunder, and Adonal Foyle Fan

by Zorgon on Apr 19, 2010 10:12 PM CDT up reply actions  


User Tools

Your SB Nation source for everything you could possibly want to know about the Oklahoma City Thunder. Quote to live by: "Taquitos, chicken wings, roasty toasties and beer. If I had a little more time, I would have done something more grandiose."

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Thunder Up SON!!!!
Ryan_2008_small
Could Durant Surpass Lebron?
Small
ESPN's Must-see Harden tee
Screen_shot_2012-04-qqqq02_at_6
James Harden "Fear the Beard" Wallpaper
Small
Forget about Miami
Small
My shout out to the Thunder
Screen_shot_2012-04-qqqq02_at_6
Kevin Durant "Game Winner" Wallpaper
Small
Hunter and Player Executive Committee to Call for Fisher’s Resignation.
Small
ThunderUp Podcast
Opgs-49789-mid_small
No Best Record? Don't Worry!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow WTLC on Twitter

Twitter-3_medium

Follow WTLC on Facebook

47 - 19

0

Won 4

14

Northwest Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
Oklahoma City 47 19 .712 0 Won 4
Denver 38 28 .575 9 Lost 1
Utah 36 30 .545 11 Lost 4
Portland 28 38 .424 19 Lost 7
Minnesota 26 40 .393 21 Lost 2

(updated 5.17.2012 at 9:26 PM CDT)

Seattle Supersonics Blogs

Loud City - Bring The Thunder (Rafter Banner)

Rafterbannersmall_medium


Founders/Main Writers

Mestylin__small Zorgon

Alec_guiness_small okluschen

Dogbert2 J.A. Sherman

Podcast Partners

Thundercast-logo_small okcthundercast

Contributing Writers

Green_small illfreaky911

Mvealpha_small MVEAlpha

Okc4_small Fakin

Hallofthegods_small Spencer Pan

Reffeet_small Jessica Lantz

Me_rocket_small ZorgonB

Small DaraMirzaie