The Four Point Swing
The summer looms like a barren wasteland. The draft is ancient history. Summer league is fading like a mirage in the Nevada desert. The NBA season is but a glimmer in every sports fan's eye. So, how do we pass the time? By over-analyzing the past, of course. After all, it is the greatest predictor of the future. First, the basic facts...
Oklahoma City started the 2008-2009 NBA season a woeful 3-29. They ended the season an optimistic 20-30, which brought their complete record to 23-59. What you may not realize is that the Thunder lost 19 games by 4 points or less. That's 19 games which could've gone the other way. What does that mean? OKC could have possibly finished the season at 42-40.
I know, it's a leap to think that they could have won all 19 of those games, but why not? Really, that's what separates the elite teams in any sport from the rest of the pack...the ability to win the close game. The question remains, have Presti and the Thunder taken the steps necesarry to win those close games? Take the jump to find out...
It's too early to know for sure, but what we do know is we've added a scoring threat at the shooting guard with James Harden. That amounts to someone helping with the scoring load. Sefalosha, while a good defensive player, only averaged 8.5 points last year while with OKC. If Harden averages 12.5 points, that could reasonably nets us 19 more games by making up that four-point difference. His stats from last year, 20.1 PPG on 48.9% shooting would certainly indicate he's capable of making up the difference.
What we also know is Kevin Durant has added 12 pounds of muscle through offseason training with his buddies at the University of Texas. This should not only add some toughness that leads to extra rebounds, but it shows that Durant is comitted to the team and being a leader. Leadership helps win close games. It gives a team focus and confidence on the court. 19 more games.
The questions still unanswered are one, a dominant defensive presence at the center position, and two, continued improvement from starters Russell Westbrook and Jeff Green. Westbrook showed his commitment by participating in Summer League.
If Presti can pull off a trade for a defensive minded center, like Marcus Camby, the four point swing could very well come on the defensive end.
In my opinion, the upcoming season could see the Thunder blossom from a lottery team to sniffing at the door to the playoffs.It's all speculation, of course, but it's not beyond the realm of possibility.
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
It is still too early to tell
One thing is for sure, I’d the continue to improve upon how they finished the season, there is no reason for them to not finish with 30 wins and even flirt with 40 or a bottom playoff seed.
-This comment brought to you by Mr Pappagiorgio aka Mister P
Welcome to Loud City | WTLC on Twitter | Mister P on Twitter | WTLC on Facebook | SBNation
by Mr Pappagiorgio on Jul 21, 2009 7:25 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
If they* …not “I’d the” continue, stupid iPhone misautocorrecting my words. Argh
-This comment brought to you by Mr Pappagiorgio aka Mister P
Welcome to Loud City | WTLC on Twitter | Mister P on Twitter | WTLC on Facebook | SBNation
by Mr Pappagiorgio on Jul 21, 2009 7:27 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
i figure this team is 32-35 wins this year.
if you want to take the 4 pt games you cant just take the losses you need to look at all of them. they went 7-19 in those games. i guess i could argue that they could have lost those 7 as well but law of averages says since they are a young and improving team a 500 split is more than likely to be the best they produce which would have been 13-13 or a 6 game improvement to 29-53 last season. With the improvements of Durant, Green, RW0 and the addition of Harden another 6 games off of that number is not unreasonable but this talk of low 40’s seems unrealistic at this point.
Yeah
Probability suggests they wouldn’t win all 19 of those games, but close games gives a better picture of how the record actually played out.
It’s more of an illustration to how close the team came to having a much better record.
They are a young and improving team, which is why I mentioned that winning the close games are what separate the elite from the rest of the back. And with the work done in the offseason, the close games should start to fall in the Thunders’ favor.
by ElectricPencils on Jul 21, 2009 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions
Hey, we don't want to hear bout other teams improving do we?
So don’t think about taking away our 7 wins. :p
Also Known as "4D" one step beyond 3D
There's also another problem here
An elite team can blow out opponents or win by a slim margin, but a win is a win. To think that a team can win or lose X close games … that would assume that all teams play a similar number of close games. I’m not sure exactly what the statistics are there, but I think it’s probably not accurate to assume that.
Games that “could have gone either way” at the end of the day failed to go their way … which doesn’t really allow us to extrapolate one way or the other on it (I think … I haven’t gone and read otherwise, but over the course of 82 games [and more] the variability starts to go down). If one thinks the last season was a total fluke, you stlil are only more likely to regress towards a mean of winning X number of those assumed not-winning games, not flip that ridiculously to one side.
Finally, the team didn’t exactly outperform Pythag W/L expectations.
That said, the team is pretty likely to do quite a bit better this year based on end of year improvement, roster refinement, and so forth. It’ll be interesting to see how things pan out.
I just ran the games from last year for the Cavs
And as a random case example, the Cavs only had 10 games decided by 4 points or less (they won 7 of the 10). Even the elite teams aren’t going to win all the close games, but they are probably going to win them at a clip that is similar to their winning percentage otherwise. Or something. I should go and actually look at the Thunder dataset later.
You make some good points
Obviously, my scenario is an extreme “best case”.
You make a good point with the Cavs observation they had 10 “close” games versus 26 for OKC. Clearly, a better team has less close games.
For OKC to be a .500 team next year, they’re going to need a lot of “luck” to go with their improvement.
by ElectricPencils on Jul 21, 2009 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree ... and you bring up some interesting points
I’d be curious to see what sort of improvements comparable (however one might define that) teams have fared in the past in terms of year to year improvements with regard to 4 point games, matchups against +.500 opposition, etc.
Hey I think your scenario makes sense.
Let says Westbrook has two less turnovers, Green pulls down two more rebounds, and someone (Ibaka?) blocks/alters a few more shots. Remember the improvements Durant and Green made in their sophomore seasons. I expect similar improvements from Westbrook, White, Weaver, and even Livingston. Not to mention the extra scoring/passing of Harden. Winning those 4 point games seems totally plausible.
Also Known as "4D" one step beyond 3D
Question for you hardcore Thunder fans since I'm still undecided as to how much I am willing to root for this team.
It seems like to me that this upcoming year, more than any other year in semi-recent history, has the finals already set. It seems like there are 2 teams from the West and 3 teams from the East that can reach the finals, maybe 5 from the West (Denver and Portland?).
Does the fact that you pretty much have no chance of sniffing the finals damper your spirits, or are most of you at ‘baby steps mode’ where little improvement in every area is the key, because it won’t really matter how good the Thunder are until Durant hits his prime (approximately year 5)?
I don't think...
any of us expect a Finals appearance soon. I’m fine with the baby steps approach, but I do see OKC making some major noise within the next three years.
Also Known as "4D" one step beyond 3D
I don't think
the Thunder are a Finals team either. I also think we’re in the early part of a building process.
That being said, I dismiss the notion that the Finals are “set”. Everyone thought the Finals were set this year with LA and Cleveland, but that didn’t happen.
Sure, there are teams who are prohibitive favorites, but you never know until you play the games.
No one expected the University of Utah to go undefeated and win a BCS game, but they did.
The great thing about sports is anything can happen. You have to account for injuries, chemistry, momentum and plain old luck.
Here’s a hypothetical,. let’s say the Thunder slip in to the playoffs at number 8. Can OKC beat the Lakers in a series? Most of us would say no. But what if Kobe goes down with an injury? Can OKC win that series. Yeah, I think they can. Next thing you know, they’re in the second round. Even without an injury, it’s still possible. Just ask the Mavericks.
So, while I’m not holding my breath that the Thunder will even make the playoffs, I will root for them in every game as if they have a chance to win it.
by ElectricPencils on Jul 21, 2009 6:57 PM CDT reply actions
For the record, according to the dataset
on Basketball Reference for 2008-2009 Thunder Stats the OKC Thunder went 7-13 in games decided by four points. Not sure where the 19 losses comes from unless my dataset is wrong or I calculated incorrectly.
I got
the stat from an article…
http://www.insidehoops.com/blog/?p=4597
Nineteen of the Thunder’s losses came by four points or less, the third-most defeats in the league by that margin, trailing only Indiana and San Antonio.
by ElectricPencils on Jul 23, 2009 8:39 PM CDT up reply actions
That's odd ... I ran the game totals from
A record of all 82 games played by the Thunder last year and came out with different totals of 7-13. Basically just =IF(ABS>0, 0, 1) in Excel/SPSS/etc and have it sum up the games. Flat count. Odd that.

by 
































